"The number of people who will pay because they sell their own home is vanishingly small," agrees Evan Horowitz of the non-partisan Tufts Center for State Policy Analysis.
“It's not clear that this ballot initiative was ever designed really to solve a problem for patients. It's designed to intervene in an ongoing dispute between insurers and dentists about where the money goes,” Horowitz said.
Evan Horowitz, executive director of the Center for State Policy Analysis, breaks down the data behind Question 1 and explains what's at stake for the state.
Horowitz dijo que el potencial de que esos registros puedan usarse para identificar y monitorear inmigrantes indocumentados es «difícil de precisar», pero «no es imaginario».
Many people who currently drive illegally would become law-abiding drivers and obtain car insurance; information...could be used to identify and track people in the future; and the state would receive more revenue from license and registration fees.
The money—about $1.3 billion in 2023, according to a Tufts University estimate—would go to education, roads, bridges, and public transit...About 0.6 percent of Bay State households would pay the surtax, according to Tufts.
"Whatever voters decide on Question 3, the broader fight over alcohol sales in Massachusetts is likely to continue, with more expansive ballot questions in the years ahead," Evan Horowitz, the group's executive director, wrote in the report.
cSPA issued a report last week that predicted a mix of outcomes: Insurers may lower monthly premiums, streamline operations..., or pay more in dental claims by covering more procedures or allowing dentists to bill higher prices.
A study released in January by cSPA found that the millionaire’s surtax could raise a “meaningful amount of money” in a “highly progressive way likely to advance racial and economic equity.”